Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:21

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
11 Sneaky Reasons You're So Gassy, According to Experts - EatingWell
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Live Updates From Apple WWDC 2025 🔴 - Gizmodo
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
BOJ braces for higher interest rates with provisions boost - Nikkei Asia
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Man accused of writing Trump assassination letters was framed, officials say - BBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Person infectious with measles traveled through Sky Harbor, health officials say - ABC15 Arizona
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What would you do if you were lost at sea in the Florida Keys?